| What is at issue here is the existence of belief, not whether one believes or does not believe in god.  It is the holding of beliefs
 that causes problems.  One god, many gods, no god: all beliefs create
 strife.  All believers are prone to violence.  Including the
 believers in the shibboleths of modernity: such as equality, liberty,
 fraternity.
 At another level, so far as the pantheism/ monotheism debate is concerned, the Abrahamic view is clearly that one god is better than
 many.  It is also a fact that it is the one god believers who have
 brought this world to such a parlous pass.  On the other hand, the
 many god believers display a far greater sense of harmony with their
 enviromnment.  I think the reason for this is that the switch to a
 belief in one god is accompanied by the simultaneous introduction of
 a belief in the absolute supremacy of human beings; i.e. people start
 believing that this "one" all powerful, god has "created" the "world"
 for human beings.  (Even many god-ders believe in the "superiority"
 of the human "yoni" but it seems to me there is a qualitative
 difference between the two - respective - notions of superiority.)
 It is as if in the process of alienating themselves from the millions of gods people that they used to believe in people also sever their
 connections with the millions of other life forms, animate and
 inanimate, that go to make up this world.  In other words, from being
 a part of "creation" people become the (ultimate) object of
 creation.  God (with a capital g) becomes exclusively devoted to the
 welfare of human beings.  Human life becomes invested with "special
 meaning.  Naturally, the rest of the world immediately recedes into
 the background; becomes "resource" to be "exploited" for the "good"
 of humanity.  The result is the unprecedented devastation that
 threatens to destroy human life on earth.
 I think there is something seriously perverted in this world view, which a belief in one god seems very prone to engendering.  I should
 not be misunderstood (or misinterpreted) as suggesting that the many
 gods world is/ was Ram Rajya and the one god world is Kali Yog.  No
 such thing.  As I mentioned earlier on, the point here is only that
 the 'one god' view seems to generate an imbalance, making world views
 very human centric.  Human nature remains what it is irrespective of
 one. god. many gods, no god.
 Ashok Agrwaal ------------------------------------ Replying to this email will send an e-mail to 11000+ members of Jharkhand Forum +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Jharkhand Forum's Posting Norms http://jharkhand.org.in/posting_norms.htm MAKE FUNDING / DONATION APPEAL HERE @ http://FUNDING-APPEAL.blogspot.com  Get yourname@jharkhandi.com, Sign-up here http://email.jharkhandi.com Learn more about Jharkhand Forum http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=vUe37cJ3BAA Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/Jharkhand/
 <*> Your email settings:Individual Email | Traditional
 <*> To change settings online go to:http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/Jharkhand/join
 (Yahoo! ID required)
 <*> To change settings via email:mailto:Jharkhand-digest@yahoogroups.co.in
 mailto:Jharkhand-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.co.in
 <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Jharkhand-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.in
 <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://in.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 |