* First of all, the very title of the article is wrong.. India at large is inclusive NOT because of gladson or the congress. People know verywell, how the christian majority North East is intolerant of other religions, while the rest of hindu majority is largely tolerant.
* Gladson has said, people had rejected communal politics. But the point has to be cleared on who is communal and who is Secular.
-->The christians in Kanyakumari, were directed by the church to vote for a particular christain candidate (fielded by DMK), and ultimately they won. -->THe churches in mangalore issued 10 commandments to its followers on whom to vote and how to vote. It also took a lead in ensuring that all christians registered themselves and voted for the party they pointed to (its not a secret ofcourse).
--> The congress openly claims the muslims votes, and it struck a deal with majority of the muslim leaders to encash the muslim vote bank. -->Similarly, Lallu, mulayam, mayawati, all compete for muslim votebank. --> Congress colliding with Muslim League, and also with MIM (of hyderabad), for the purpose of winning muslim votes.
--> Congress approved madarassa education as equivalent to CBSE, a worst kind of move that would degrate the quality of education at large.
There are many more to cite.. and i will leave it to the decision of the people, to find out who is really communal here.
* Unfortunately Gladson goes on to declare that majority of indians vote for secularism, development, none of which is represented by congress party or others. Yet, he would spill his ultimate hatred for L.K. Advani, and claim to be secular, peace loving. Is there any end to hypocrisy?
* Again, he has resorted to the old wounds, by quoting gujarat riots, kandhamal violence etc. And for gods sake, and for the unspecified number of times, he had been answered in this forum itself, that gujarat riot was incited by 2000 muslim mob who burned 56 kar sevaks, and the resulting riot was backslash from the hindu community, for which the government had no role. Also,the duplicity and false propoganda by teesta stalvad and other self styled secular champions had been exposed recently by the so called riot victim themselves.
* Gladson also touches the kandhamal violence, but had conveniently ignored the killing of Swamy Lakshmanandha saraswathi, nor he had demanded a fair trial in to this killing. The forum members are well aware, that none of the those who called themselves as secular, ever demanded for an inquiry in to the killing of the swamiji. Reason is apt.. the victim here is a Hindu saint, and thus anything happening to them is to be ignored. Is it the kind of inclusiveness that gladson advocates?
Also, he had conveniently ignored the recent news that number of kandhamal victims had been manipulated, and even the RSS activitists killed by christian gunmen were added to the victims of the aftermath. More importantly, many of the dead victims are NOW ALIVE.
* Gladson is claiming that congress took stringent action against Shivraj Patil after mumbai attack. This is again a biased view, as no action is taken on shivraj patil, when there was more than 10 bomb blasts before, and that, till today, the names of the other 11 men, who came along with kasab has been not revealed.
We also note that the trial of the kasab is deliberately delayed, and also, we could see the difference of treatement for kasab, and the pragnya singh. No self-respecting indians might accept such a harsh treatment for a person like pragnya singh, who was NOT yet proved, but a luxury treatment for kasab, whose crime, the whole world saw.
* So gladson proved himself to be torchbearer of UPA, thus by implicit biased in favor of the government, overseeing its utter weakness.
* Gladson also criticised advani for attacking manmohan singh. But again, he sidesteps the issue that Manmohan singh is the person with office without authority, and the real power is vested with Sonia gandhi (alias antonio maino), who has full authority, but NO accountability.
Again, can a self-respecting nation tolerate such a modern era colonialism and dictatorship?
* Gladson also says that BJP is creating fear among youth in the name of terrorism. the whole country was at fear, NOT because BJP said about terrorism, but because of the inaction of the congress government, and the continuous bomb blasts that happened. I can say, this is the height of intellectual subversion, that these pseudo seculars are spreading among innocent indians.
Gladson in his article, had projected himself as marketing man of the congress, and thus he had deviated far from discussing about the real facts.
The BJP which was started for the Hindu people, decided to dilute its hindutva stance to accomodate all other people, and now being deserted by those people. But still it is being called as hindutva and communal party.
At the same time, the congress, which is shamelessly creatinng divisions to create its own christian and muslim votebank, and discriminates the majority and favors the christians and muslim in the name of minorityism. Yet its called as secular.
I request those enlightened indians, to understand the level of intellectual subversion unleashed by these pseudo seculars, and give a befitting reply to them.
In India, there is room for everyone. But in a muslim or in a christian religion?
Note: To post your contents (press release, messages, articles, write-up, issues for public discussions and documentary video) at this website, simply send it to Jharkhand@yahoogroups.com. No sign-up required.